Friday, November 11, 2005
2:28 AM
Hand Evaluation – Visualization ( Puzzles )
PITBULLS:
It is very exasperating to be
defending with someone who has a liking for solving puzzles outside the game of Bridge. They spend countless hours doing
puzzles but when they play Bridge they ignore a vast opportunity to solve
puzzles. Defense in the game of Bridge is
basically solving puzzles , some easy & some difficult.
There are pieces of the puzzle in the dummy , in the
bidding & in partners signals. There are pieces of the puzzle by the way
the declarer is playing the hand. Put all the pieces together & solve the puzzle !!
The dummy is your friend
in the game of Bridge either as defender or
declarer. You do not need to be formal as in Dora meet dummy or
dummy meet Dora , but take the time to get acquainted
! On defense , build
partial patterns using your hand
with the dummy. What do I mean by partial patterns ?
Build the first two steps in your pattern by acknowledging
how many cards are in key suits taking your
hand and the dummy
into consideration. You have 5 spades , there are 4 on
the board. Mentally say 5-4 so your pattern is well on the way to being built. Partner is the missing link along with declarers bidding. She
gives you count quite often , so the pattern can
become complete. Declarer leads a spade from the board & partner plays the 9 showing
standard count. Houston , we have lift off ! The pattern is now
complete 5-4-2-2 . The goal of this game is to know declarer’s hand. We now know that
declarer has two spades. This is valuable information.
What about the other side of the dummy ? The dummy with the opening lead allows you to build a complete pattern , not a partial one . Partner leads the diamond 9 , there are 4 diamonds on the board & you have 4 of them. How many does declarer have ? Simple, fill in the blanks with your memorized patterns. 4-4-3-2 so declarer has 3 diamonds. Again valuable information. Sometimes these are tentative distributions because if partner led a singleton diamond 9 or 9 from 987 , you are out one. So what ? A partial plan or pattern is better than none at all.
Declarer plays a suit
, partner shows out. This is a superb discovery play . Apply a pattern immediately. Partner leads a suit &
declarer ruffs. You apply a pattern so it turns out partner has a 7 card suit.
This is valuable information also ! This means there
are only 6 cards left in partners
hand so that gives you clues to declarers
distribution. This information guides
you on your defense. Whether to switch to a trump ,
tap the declarer , what card to discard i.e. defending properly. Otherwise, it is just random guessing so you invariably hand declarer her
contract.. You have lost an opportunity to solve a puzzle which is fun !
The 4th and last way to
build a picture of declarers hand is discarding. Signaling is “depending on
context” . Signaling by discarding is attitude most of the time. However when
declarer is attempting a squeeze , quite often you switch to count instead for you discards.
Declarer is running clubs in 6NT so is attempting a pseudo squeeze. Show count
when you discard. Partner discards the diamond deuce showing 3 playing standard
count. There are 4 on the board & you have 5 . You
say to yourself 5-4-3-1 so declarer only has one of them so you discard accordingly.
Declarer play uses patterns to
visualize the hands for advanced plays like squeezes & endplays or just
finding queens. Tom Gandolfo
has been known to play hands “double dummy”. What does that term mean ? I remember a hand that Tom played in Calgary againt the Dann’s. He was in 4♥
with a horrific trump break & Dan Bertrand had overcalled
3♣ on the auction. Dann Krammer led the club king , I put down AJx of clubs
with the Kx of spades. Tom won the Ace
, stripped the red suits coming down to a 4 card end position. Tom had
used the information given to him that RHO had a 7 card club suit & had
freely overcalled. He led a small spade towards the spade King & ducked.
Bertrand was down to Qx of clubs & AQ frozen of spades. He won his
spades so was end played to the club jack on the board for +620 just as Tom had
planned.
I watched my partner make a trump
coup where he got a horrible trump break so he had to assume a theoretical
pattern for the coup to be successful & play for it. He ruffed himself down
to their length in the trump suit & end played them to get an additional
entry to the board. Coming off the board the defender was defenseless. He ruffed so partner over ruffed & the game made. Partner
could not make this hand without thinking & applying hypothetical
patterns. When the hypothetical turned out to be the real distribution ,
the hand made ! Solving puzzles ,
one of the reasons we play the game of Bridge.
Have I ever mentioned the importance of patterns
in the game of Bridge before ??