Thursday, September 28, 2006
2:15 AM
Hand Evaluation - Visualization ( Counting HCP'S )
PITBULLS:
With years of experience in the game
of Bridge , counting HCP’s becomes a routine
skill. More advanced counting of HCP’s is during the hand
as declarer or on defense. This is called being a “human
odometer” as you keep track of HCP’s as they are being played. This
skill can also become routine with practice . This
skill is assumed if you are a Bridge expert.
The last domain for the counting of
HCP’s is during the bidding
. This is called quantitative bidding. You add
partners announced bids to yours & make partial ,
game & slam decisions. Balancing is also done by adding expected HCP’s that
the opponents have shown & weighing the risks of entering the auction.
Counting HCP’s is a way of a check
back for leaving in penalty doubles of your 3NT doubled. A
bid I like which was invented by Meckwell apparently
is the XX expressing doubt. Your partner makes a bid that shows a particular
HCP range & lands in 3NT doubled.
You are not sure if the contract will make or not. A pass says
partner lets play it in 3NT. A XX says “I have doubt”
whether 3NT can make but I do have some values or I would be
running. When you have extra , lets
play it here. A solid partnership understanding for handling 3NTX
contracts..
Counting HCP’s can assist you in
making a decision whether to leave in your doubled 3NT contract. Perry opened 1♥
with ♠xx ♥KQJxx ♦KJx ♣K10x , they overcalled 2♣. I bid 2♦ & Perry bid 2NT as would every Bridge player on
the planet. I carried on to 3NT & this was passed around to the overcaller who doubled. I did not pull 3NT but I
passed saying lets play this contract. Should
Perry believe the doubler & pull
? No , a simple count of HCP’s makes passing
clear cut. Partner has no HCP’s in clubs or he probably would have XX’d showing club values. Partner has shown 13-14 HCP’s on
the bidding so where are they looking at your hand ? The Ace of
hearts & AQ of diamonds is not enough as that is only 10 HCP’s so not consistent
with the bidding. Partner must have spade cards also .
The doubler is gambling on a club lead
, getting in with the spade Ace & running his clubs. You have a
surprise for him as you can count 11 tricks before he leads
! You XX so they are in serious trouble as they are vul vrs not.
An unmitigated disaster for them as you took the time to count partners
HCP’s.
Counting HCP’s during the bidding
comes up frequently in slam bidding. When partner makes a quantitative
bid showing X number of HCP’s , you just do arithmetic
& leap to the correct level. Counting HCP’s are made easier when partner
makes a splinter bid as you can discount HCP’s in that suit. A tormentee held this hand ♠AQJxx
♥A ♦AQxx ♣KQx & partner
opened 1♠ . She bid 2NT
& partner showed a stiff ♥
. This auction is now over.
Partner has an opening bid with no HCP’s in hearts so where are they ? ♠K , ♦KJ & ♣AJ is only 12
HCP so where is the opening bid ? You say skip bid 7♠ & partner should be able to claim
as your hand is completely filled in. A splinter gives you a clue to count
partners HCP’s during the auction. There are 40 HCP’s in the deck.
Here is a hand where counting HCP’s
when partner is a passed hand is the key to success. In 3rd seat vul my partner opened 1♣ & Osama overcalled 1♦ . As a passed hand , I bid 2♠ with ♠J10876x ♥x
♦Q9x ♣QJx . Partner has ♠void ♥AQJx ♦AJxx ♣AKxxx so bells
should start ringing. Why didn’t partner open a weak 2♠ in first seat ? The obvious answer is that her spade suit was not
good enough but when partner opens the bidding ,
you can take the chance with a weak jump shift. OK , when partner does not have
HCP’s in spades where are they ? If not in diamonds given the overcall ,
not in spades so they must be in clubs & hearts . Happiness , you may have
9 top tricks in NT , so you leap to 3NT which is cold for +600. Partner
missed the weak 2♠ inference & thought my HCP’s were in spades which does not
make any sense. He passed 2♠ & I went down 2 vul
on a cross ruff when 3NT was lay down.
Doubling NT contracts & leaving
in the double or their XX is simply counting HCP’s during the auction.
Some dreadful Bridge decisions were made recently because the players simply
did not bother to count the HCP’s during the auction. This
blunder resulted in very expensive wrong decisions as 1NTXX making vul is –760 . Counting HCP’s
during the bidding meant the HCP’s were evenly divided 20-20 so risking a XX
game contract was silly. Too close to call for that sort of gambling.