Friday,
October 13, 2006 5:14 PM
Hand Evaluation – Systemic ( 2NT Competition )
PITBULLS:
The meaning of a word in the English
language sometimes is defined by how it is used in a sentence. In the game of Bridge,
the meaning of a bid quite often is determined via the context of the auction. The most common
“depending on context” bids in Bridge are the Q bid, the double & 2NT. It is impossible
to define these
bids without hearing the bidding first.
Let’s discuss the much maligned 2NT bid. The
bid can be unusual showing two suits, showing the minors, Good-bad 2NT ( Lebensohl ) & scrambling over
a double. The 2NT bid can be natural & invitational
, a godfather “new suit” forcing one round
( 4th suit forcing ) , an 18-19 HCP hand , a NT range hand after a 2
level overcall , a flat 20-21 if used as an opening bid , 13-15 game forcing if
used by responder or a strong fit major fit ( Jacoby 2NT ) . How do you know
the difference ? The context of the bidding is the only way.
The “good-bad “
2NT give people problems. This bid is narrowly
defined & is only used when the opponents bidding in the “sandwich position” prevent you from jumping to the 3 level to invite. Scrambling 2NT is used in conjunction
with partners T/O or penalty double. You are scrambling to the best spot. The scrambling 2NT is how you
bid flat hands without a 5 card suit after partner’s double .
You scramble to your lowest ranking 4 card suit & partner does the same
until your fit is found.
When is 2NT natural
in competition ? The context of the auction for natural
2NT bids is where the opponents have
made a weak bid.
. They are trying to con you out of your rightful 3NT contract thru acts of terrorism , so the 2NT bid becomes natural. The most obvious examples are when the
opponents have made weak bids
such as weak jump overcalls , weak jump shifts , weak 2’s and 3 level pre-empts. When they announce weakness to
the table, your 2NT bid becomes natural.
Artificial 2NT bids are the reverse process.
The opponents have announced
strength, so your 2NT bid cannot be natural or you choose a bid like
double or pass.
Steve Willard held ♠xxxxx ♥Jxxx ♦x ♣xxx , Alex Fowlie opened 1♦ & I passed.
Willard paid his card fees so he is not allowed to pass so he bid 2♠ on the
above collection. Quoting the Bridge philosopher Susan Culham , you sometimes must fight terrorism when it rears its head. Susan held ♠AKJ ♥K10xxx ♦xx
♣Axx so she bids 2NT. You do not pre-empt with a 2NT bid vrs a pre-empt ( weak jump shift ) so the context of the auctions
deems the 2NT bid not to be a toy. When you can describe your
distribution & HCP’s in one bid
in competition, it
is best to do it. Susan’s hand is flawed as she does not have a diamond
stopper. I would still bid 2NT though as at least the balanced hand with the
specific HCP range is described. When no adverse bidding ,
she would have opened the hand 1NT. The alternatives of passing or 3♥ are dangerous
as they could re-pre-empt or you could go for a number in 3♥X. A descriptive
bid of 2NT gets your side off to the best
start. The fact that they pre-empted , defines your bid.
The opponents bidding can alter your
plans to make a 2NT rebid as opener. When you have a gilt edged
18-19 & they interfere in the sandwich spot
with a double, bidding
2NT just rescues them from
disaster sometimes. With the appropriate hand & vulnerability
, I prefer to pass & start wielding the axe. The redouble is usually
support , so the pass is the weapon of choice. Over a double , a
2NT bid quite often is based on “playability”. You have the HCP range but your
hand is suited for
offense ( 6 card suit ? ) rather than defense.
“Depending on context”
for defining 2NT bids in competition – do not leave home & come to the
Bridge club without it !!