Friday, October 27, 2006 12:26 AM
Hand Evaluation – Minorwood
( Taking Control )
PITBULLS:
Minorwood should follow captaincy rules. Systemic
minor suit KCB should not be possible
from either a limited hand or even a strong NT. Why ?
Because the other hand knows more about what is happening so is the captain of the auction. Normally system
bidders do not like a strong
NT taking control of an auction. In other auctions when a minor
fit has been found under the 4 level ,
bidding the agreed minor at the 4 level is
KCB. Not so when a strong NT is involved, because captaincy is not respected. We feel that in all
systemic minor auctions involving a strong NT ,
Kickback should be KCB instead.
Here
is an auction which drives the point home. My partner came up with a creative
bid holding ♠Ax ♥x ♦AQ10xxx ♣KQxx after I opened 1NT . Partner
has a variety of choices. He can show a single suited diamond hand , followed by showing the stiff heart or he can Re-Stayman the hand. My partner thought of a 3rd
alternative. He bid 3♠ which shows a stiff
heart with and 5-4 in the minors !!. This way he got
both minor suits in the mix with the stiff heart in one bid
!!
I now
bid 4♦ so what does that mean ? Technically , we found the
fit at the 3 level via the systemic 3♠ bid so that should
be KCB for diamonds. Wrong ! 4♦ just says this is
the agreed suit announcing we do not have severe duplication of
value in hearts. 4♥ by the other side is
now KCB so the correct hand is taking control of the auction. It is now simple
to get to 7♦ with the correct partner being captain of the auction.
Kickback is used as minor suit KCB when the minor fit is just found at the 4
level but it should also be used when the wrong person is bidding 4 of the
minor. If the known limited hand is
bidding 4 of the agreed minor or a strong NT is bidding 4 of a minor , minorwood does not apply
. Adjust your system accordingly so
there will be less KCB disasters.