Wednesday, April 20, 2005 4:59 AM

Hand Evaluation - Serious 3NT ( 5-3 Fits )

 

PITBULLS:

 

            In order to get maximum effectiveness from the serious 3NT in 2/1 auctions , you need some partnership understandings. A common 2/1 auction involving serious 3NT after a 2/1 is finding your 4-4 major suit fit. There is an understanding that why play 3NT as natural when you went to the trouble of finding your 4-4 fit ? Therefore 3NT is a serious slam try Q bid. What about 5-3 major suit fits where a 3NT bid could be a suggestion that 3NT is a better natural contract. ? My opinion is that 3NT as a Q bid is too valuable a tool to not use it as a “serious slam” try even in these auctions. A leap to 3NT is never a serious 3NT Q bid , so that jump suggests an alternative contract.

 

1-P-2♣-P

2-P-2-P

2NT/3NT.

 

           

            What about when NT rears its head in these 5-3 major fit hands ? I believe that you should not be able to suggest a NT contract twice in the same auction with 8 card fit major hands ( 5-3 or otherwise ). When you or partner have suggested NT as a contract but it has been rejected by finding a 5-3 fit , 3NT is now a Q bid. Klimo and Tom had an auction that demonstrates this nicely.

 

Tom        10xx    x           AJxxx   AQJx

 

Klimo    AQxxx   AKQ     Qx      xxx

 

            The auction goes 1-P-2-P 

                                             2NT-P-3-P  ?      Klimo bid 2NT as an either or bid . A hand that evaluates to 18 + or a minimum . Tom rejected a NT contract by finding a 5-3 spade fit. 3NT now must be a Q bid in support of spades so shows serious slam interest with the higher NT range. Tom now dutifully bids 4♣ , Klimo bids 4 denying a diamond control. Tom now knows the partnership is off the diamond King and his spades are not good. Tom accordingly signs off in 4 . Klimo is “all in” with his serious slam try so they avoid the 5 level which is precarious to say the least.

 

            Say you bid the hand the so called standard way. Klimo bids 4 suggesting a slam try but Tom signs off. Klimo bids 5 but that does not help Tom’s hand since he had a stiff and duplication of value is present . Therefore , Tom shows good hand evaluation by signing off again. However , it is too late as we have reached the 5 level .  5 ended up with a 4-1 break and two spade losers so it’s a terrible contract . 12 IMPS thrown away for not using the “serious 3NT” tool . The 5 level is for the opponents for slam tries also J

 

        What about a 2/1 where a 5-3 major suit fit is found & NT has never been bid ? Serious 3NT was invented for these auctions. There is an unlimited hand & you have a major suit fit. You do not have the luxury of suggesting an alternative contract when a major suit fit is found in a 2/1 auction.. 3NT is a serious slam try.

 

1♠-P-2-P

3-P-3♠-P

3NT              Serious slam try . Opener should have bid NT earlier to suggest an alternative contract. Opener probably wants to solicit a ♣ Q bid.

 

 AKxxx Kx AKxx ♣xx

 

1♠-P-2♣-P

2-P-3-P

3NT                  serious slam tram .    2/1 auctions are the most common setting for the “serious 3NT”.