Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:16 AM
Hand
Evaluation - Italian Q bids
PITBULLS:
Whether you have bought into the philosophy of
the "serious 3NT" or not , Q bids are
still an area to be discussed . Q bids are a hand evaluation or bidding
skill. The serious 3NT philosophy is based on no fast arrival to game in
a major when partner is unlimited ,
unless you have no controls outside. Instead , you Q bid even if you have nothing extra.
There are 2 styles of Q bidding , one
which is so called standard , the other one which the Italians (blue
team ) made famous . The standard way of Q bidding of course is 1st round
control first ,
followed by second round controls.
The Italians and Fred Gittleman in his articles on "serious 3NT" play the Italian style of Q bidding . This means that a Q bid can be either
a 2nd or 1st round control when initially bid . 2nd round controls include singletons . Therefore , you
do not know how many Aces you have so Blackwood is necessary for all slam
auctions . We have brought this up before in "serious
3NT" discussions but I think it is worth repeating . Follow the rank order of suits with your Q bids but
treat 1st & 2nd round controls as equal importance ( not Standard American ).
♠ x xxx
♥ AKQxxx J10x
♦
xxx
AKQxx
1♥ 2♦
♣ Axx Kx 2♥ 3♥
3♠
Q bid 2nd
round spade
control first , then your club ace when convenient . This allows a margin of safety . Standard Q bidding auction below
:
♠
xxx xxx
♥ AKQxxx
J10x 1♥ 2♣
♦
Ax
KQ 2♥ 3♥
♣
xx AKQJ10 4♦ 5♣
(oops we are down
at the 5 level ) With the inference that
partner does not have 2nd control in spades or she would
have bid it "Italian style" keeps us out of the 5 level whether we
play "serious 3NT" or not.
We think we should adopt the
Italian style of Q bidding but be very careful &
use Blackwood for slams. So it does not matter which control you Q bid anymore.
Up the line Q bidding still applies though.
ex
♠ Kx
Axx
♥ AKQxxx J10x
1♥ 2♣
♦ Axx
Kx 2♥ 3♥
♣
xx
AKxxx 3♠
4♣
4♦ 4♠
2nd round in spades bid before 1st round but who cares ? You have them both ..
The ability to Q bid singletons will make your splinters more
disciplined ( possibly always have 4 trump ) . However , as I mentioned in a previous article , splinters
are still a better way to find out duplication of value & stay out of messy
contracts.
If you are past Blackwood , Q bids should be first
round control ex
4♥
1♠
4♠
5♣
Stupid to bid 2nd round control when we do not have Blackwood to
fall back on.
Common sense should still
prevail .
Here is
a hand where a player did not consider a singleton as a control
along with her Aces so she violated the rank order of Q bidding. ♠Axx ♥Axx ♦x ♣QJxxxx . I opened 1♣ &
her RHO overcalled 1♥. She bid 2♥ showing
limit raise or better so I bid 2♠. They interfered with 3♥ so now what ? She can bid 3♠
or 4♦ both of which conserve bidding room with the rank order of Q bidding
. However , she choose to bid 4♥.
I bid 4♠ to play as I was 6-5 & knew we did not have a
diamond control. Partner bid 5♣ which was passed out & I claimed 6♣.
One
of the important points about Italian cuebids is that
when partner skips a suit in the
rank order scheme , denying a control in that suit,
you must sign off immediately if you don't have a control either.
You pick up:
♠ JTxx
♥ AKQx
♦ xx
♣ JTx
Partner opens 1♠. You make a limit raise of 3♠. Partner bids 4♦.
What is your call?
Partner's 4♦ bid
has denied a club control, so you must bid 4♠. A bid of 4♥ would promise that you hold a club control
(indeed, whether it says you hold a heart control is a problem for a high-level
partnership discussion!). Last Train bids says that 4♥ does not show a heart control but a club
control. Do not forget that 4♦ denies both
the Ace & King of clubs.
Partner held:
♠ AKQxxx
♥ x
♦ AKQ
♣ xxx
It would be great
to stop in 4♠ wouldn't it?
Anyway , give Italian Q bids some
thought , the Italian way of Q bidding makes more
sense to me than the
standard treatment . I will try to coerce Mr. Jones
in playing them but he is still dragging his feet about the serious 3NT ( refuses to even discuss it ) . There are disadvantages to the
"serious 3NT" as it is too accurate sometimes. When both sides of the
partnership are Q bidding with minimum values while staying
out of slam ,
you assist the opponents on their opening leads.
Klimo
says "serious 3NT" has got him to some nice slams but has cost him match
points on the opening leads ! Also the leap to
game in a major ( a no no
with serious 3NT ) makes the opponents lead a little bit more blind . So whether
you adopt the "serious 3NT" is dependent on your "religious
beliefs" about the game of Bridge to borrow a
phrase from Klimo .