Sunday, May 18, 2003
5:47 PM
Hand Evaluation – Doubles ( Thrump
Doubles )
PITBULLS:
When
opponents pre-empt , their main purpose is to screw up your auction. Stated differently , they want
you out of 3NT . Thrump doubles are a
great counter measure. Another
sinister purpose of their pre-empting is to jam you so you cannot find your 4-4
major fit . The classic negative double was invented to counter act that strategy. I
feel you can use the negative double at the 3 level with both types of hands .
The classic negative double & the hand that Marty Bergen
describes below. This treatment just demands that opener assumes a Thrump double first so bids 3NT with a stopper rather than a 4 card
major. If she has no stopper , she just bids naturally which could mean
bidding her 4 card major . Without Thrump doubles included in your 3 level negative double structure , a minor bid by the doubler
would be a Q bid with an implied major suit fit suggesting a slam . With Thrump doubles , the minor is natural
as our attempt to play 3NT failed , so we are bailing to our long minor. Giving
up implied Q bids is a small price to pay
to get to 3NT.
A direct Q bid is always a fit for partners suit .
Thrump doubles do not change that understanding. With Thrump doubles the worst thing that can happen is that you
miss your 4-4 major fit & play 3NT when you have
the stopper. Is that so bad in IMPS ? With 7 card
suits lurking , trump quite often break badly so 3NT
is the preferred contract anyway . It is also very hard to get ruffs in 3NT .
When playing a treatment ,
frequency of occurrence of the hands is an issue for the partnership .The
classic negative double is not
lost playing Thrump doubles . Partner
just has to be aware that the double could be a Thrump double
. The type of hands Marty Bergen brings up below are frequent and impossible to
bid when the opponents pre-empt at the 3 level . His
double only applies at the 3 level ( ♥ ♦ ♠
) and negative doubles still are on thru 4♦ or
whatever level you play them . There is just an additional meaning at
the 3 level and you are
required to bid 3NT with a stopper. Bergen should have used the classic negative
double in his examples as well ..
|
A |
A |
x |
x |
|
K |
K |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
Partner assumes a Trump double initially
so bids 3NT when you make a negative double with this hand at the 3 level. .
There is no guarantee that 4 of a major is a better or safer contract with
pre-emptive auctions . Quite often the pre-empter does not have an entry and the more frequent 4-1
major suit breaks can be handled in 3NT.
Below
a review of the Thrump double concept directly from Marty Bergen :
“Thrump doubles,” as described here, were invented by yours
truly. While they certainly are different, experience
has shown that they are essential
at the three level.
What
is a thrump double and why do we need them? The
discussion of the bidding on this hand will
clue you in.
ª Q7 © Q2 ¨ 1087
§ AKQJ75
Once
your partner has opened the bidding, you are thinking about 3NT. In fact, I
will bet that is the case regardless of which suit your partner opened. You
will show your clubs and points and hope partner bids notrump
sooner or later.
Nice
plan. Now suppose that your RHO jumps to 3¨, 3© or 3ª before you are able to make your first
bid. Are you going to
give up on the 3NT contract you were heading for? If you make the
“normal” 4§ bid, do you expect partner to provide the
five tricks you will need to bring home 5§?
What
is my suggestion? Make a negative double. However, instead of defining it as just looking for the unbid
major(s), think of it as looking for THRee notrUMP
also. On most hands where partner has a stopper in the opponent’s
suit, you would like him to bid 3NT.
When
is this needed? When the enemy’s natural jump overcall reaches 3¨, we cannot necessarily show our suit
without going past 3NT. Here are the 10 auctions where the opponent has made a
natural, preemptive jump overcall above 3§ and below 3NT.
1§ - (3¨) 1§ - (3©) 1§ - (3ª)
1¨ - (3¨) 1¨ - (3©) 1¨ - (3ª)
1© - (3¨) 1ª - (3©) 1© - (3ª)
1ª - (3¨)
Must you
have a solid suit? Absolutely not. A thrump double
would be totally appropriate after 1© - (3ª) with:
ª 864
© 65 ¨ AQ754
§ AQ2 or
ª 93 © K7 ¨ KQ10865
§ KQ8 or
ª 63 © A2 ¨ 852
§
AK10854
Now you
are responder after 1§ - (3©).
ª K3 © 84 ¨ AKQJ5
§ J753
(Double,
hoping partner bids 3NT.)
ª KQ863
© KQ2
¨ K7 § 985
(Forget your spades. You have hearts
stopped so bid 3NT.)
ª AK © A64
¨ AK83
§ J852
(Once in a blue moon you will have a great
hand with a stopper in the opponent’s suit. In that case, you can start with a
negative double and then explore for slam.)
Applies when the jump overcall is 3¨, 3©
or 3ª.
Tells
opener to bid 3NT when he has a stopper in the opponent’s suit.
Says nothing
specific about responder’s holding in the unbid
suits.
Almost always
denies a stopper in the opponent’s suit.
Responder denies a
five-card major that he could have bid at the three level.
Promises at least
10 HCP and denies three-card support for opener’s major.
Worth noting: responder could have a very long minor.