Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:12 PM
Hand Evaluation - Doubles ( Partnership Bridge )
PITBULLS:
D.S.I.P. competitive doubles require
an absolutely new approach to thinking in
competitive situations. In all Bridge bidding , only three scenarios can be applicable . You own
the auction or you do not. If it
is self evident that you own the auction , standard
forcing pass theory takes precedence. When you are actively competing but you
do not own the auction or are not
sure if you do , D.S.I.P. competitive double theory
takes over. The 3rd case
is when they own the auction or at the 5 level , old fashioned trump stack penalty doubles or action doubles can apply. This structure
allows partnership Bridge to take place.
D.S.I.P. doubles
are just the opposite of standard penalty double thinking which is very single handed
Bridge. A standard double in a competitive
auction says I have a trump stack so put on the breaks partner. In D.S.I.P. theory , the double
is just the opposite
. It says I have defense but want to take offensive
action with no duplication of
value in their suit. Why the switch from traditional thinking
?? This is due to the nature of
the game of Bridge itself. Bridge by definition is played in a clockwise order. In many , many competitive auctions , partner with no duplication of value & defense
“likes his hand” so competes one more time in
your suit. Much to your dismay , this is
the wrong action as you wanted to make a trump stack penalty double but did not
get the chance. A single handed decision was made
for the partnership rather than a joint one. Pseudo sacrifices at the game level or wrong partial swings at lower levels are very common. The culprit
is duplication of value in their
suit with standard penalty double
thinking. There are many bids in Bridge which ferret out duplication of value . Splinters are the most popular method. D.S.I.P.
doubles are the tool of choice for finding
duplication of value in competitive bidding.
♠ QJ109xx
♥ AKQxx ♦ Ax ♣ void
This is a real hand from a Thurs nite
quoted by Tom Gandolfo . The opponents opened
1♣-P-3♣-4♣
P-P-4♠-5♣ ? The opponents are bidding your void at the
5 level . You need next to nothing from partner to make 5♠ , in fact 6♠ is a possibility. Every undisciplined Bridge player in the world
would bid 5♠ . They all would be wrong
because when forcing pass theory applies
you can afford to pass the decision to
partner. The 5♣ bid does turn on forcing passes as they are obviously sacrificing. Your 4 level Q bid should have turned on forcing
passes anyway as you are committing your side to game. The opponents
actions alone though, can switch on forcing pass theory.
Partners hand is ♠xxx ♥xxx ♦xx ♣AQJ98 !! . In forcing pass theory , when you have a huge hand with defense &
want to bid 5♠ , you ask partners
permission to bid 5♠ by passing. Forcing pass theory is beautiful partnership bidding .
Both forcing pass theory & D.S.I.P. preserve
captaincy in these auctions. I have what I described for my 4♣
bid ( maybe more ) ,so over to you partner. D.S.I.P. competitive double theory borrows from the same idea by bringing partner into
the decision making process.