Tuesday,
May 23, 2006 10:29 AM
Hand
Evaluation - Doubles ( Pushing Opponents
)
PITBULLS:
Pushing the opponents into a good game , partial or slam
where they would never reach on their own
is a sign of poor
competitive bidding. As usual , this Bridge sin is caused by ambiguity in
competitive bidding. Is partner bidding one more because she has something or is she just competing & may want to buy the contract
for a small minus ? Anyway,
your guess . Experts do not guess but wait for
partner to double to
clarify things for them.
Also, when
you have super fit , the fit detracts
from your side’s defensive strength. Since you have announced to them that they have no duplication
of value, they bid one more. With a fit but no defense ,
get the auction up high fast &
let sleeping dogs lay. As Garazzo says
, do not enter or continue a fight that
you can not win. No not “St Albert” & badly
describe your hand the first time & violate
captaincy to make up for it later.
The silliest way of pushing opponents into slam is when you know
something they do not & they have made an ambiguous bid .
Susan Culhan held ♠x ♥KQJxx ♦Jxxx ♣xxx and heard her partner open 2♥ nv vrs vul in 3rd
seat & they made an ambiguous 4♠ overcall. You have killed your partner’ s hand so you have no defense against 7♠. This
is a fight you cannot win as they hold the boss suit. Susan
passed & they made +680 as the passed hand to her left did not bid. . At one
table , 5♥ was bid so the
opponents were pushed into their +1430. Noting seat position is also a good way
of not pushing them to slam . When your LHO is a
passed hand , let the pre-empt
do its dirty work . Pre-empts were designed to be destructive for the
opponents.
People do get pushed to slams though . Susan
had a 4-3-3-3 16 HCP with ♦xxx & my partner opened 1♦. She overcalled 1NT to make the most descriptive bid possible. Kiz transferred to spades & my partner bid 3♦ . Susan bid 3♠ & her partner said we own the auction by
contracting for game in spades. They now bid 5♦ so doubling
with nothing in diamonds is a nonsense bid. Beginners
bid the same NT they have already announced
but experts use the opponents to their own advantage. Susan passes 5♦ so with a
strong NT opening that says no duplication of value
in ♦’s partner. Kiz with her void in diamonds bids
6♠ & +1430 . Kiz
did not make a slam try as she was worried about duplication of value in
diamonds.
A fix for this competitive ambiguity when forcing passes
do not apply is playing competitive doubles or D.S.I.P. theory.
When partner has bid a couple of times
but has neglected to make a double to show good defense ,
you quietly put the pass card on
the table. A young good B player pushed the opponents into a couple of vul games recently that were not about to reach thereby
ruining his partner’s competitive bidding.
His partner opened 1♦ , they overcalled 2♣ . responder passed ,
they bid 2♥. Opener backed in 2♠ so they competed to 3♣ . Responder came alive by bidding 3♦ freely. They bid
3♥ so around to responder again. What has not happened at the table ? Opener, after bidding twice
did not double
to show a defensive hand. This
was ignored , responder bid 4♦ so the
opponents bid again & were rewarded with a cold vulnerable game.
Not playing D.S.I.P. doubles kills your ability to compete accurately.
Partner reads that you have a good hand solely because you bid
twice. Nonsense
, he was just competing so
by his failure to double , he is announcing that
he is just competing. There are other ways of realizing that partner is just competing. This
is the negative inference on what partner has not done earlier in the auction. A double is a clarifying bid in competitive
auctions. It does not mean the opponents have bid badly. That notion
is for beginners in weak games.
A Tormentee
held this hand ♠KJx ♥QJ ♦xxx
♣AKxxx , everybody vul they opened 1♥ so around to
her. You have some defense with a tolerance for the unbid
major , shortness in their suit , so most players would double. The Tormentee bid 2♣ which is a more ambiguous bid ( weaker , longer clubs , no major tolerance ? ) . This
brought 2♦ by the opening bidder & I passed. This was corrected to 2♥ so around to me
again. I bid 2♠, it went 3♥ so do you bid again ? Partner never
overcalled 1♠ nor did he compete over 2♦. He at no time
made a competitive double. The Tormentee bid 3♠ , all passed so down 3 vul on a ruff. We ended up
with an above average board because the field was getting to their +650 in
hearts. In the absence of competitive doubles ,
you should be worried that you will push the
opponents into a cold game.
By partner bidding spades , he has ruined your hand defensively with the QJ of hearts
being doubleton will be a welcome surprise for them. As Kenny Rogers says “know when to fold them” & use the
green card. 3♥ making 5 would be a top our way. Hand
evaluation & reading the table is a huge part of competitive bidding. Listening for
partner’s competitive double that never came is a clue.
Do not forget that since pushing opponents into a cold game
is horrible bidding , there is an inference
when you do push
them into game. That inference is that you own the auction ,
therefore forcing pass theory
kicks in. 90 % of the time they end up being doubled as the balance of power is
in your direction , but there are times when other forcing pass elements like the pass enter the
picture.