Monday, July 07, 2003 4:48 PM
Hand Evaluation – Doubles
( Enforcer Doubles )
PITBULLS:
Playing with a partner that plays the “Bridge
cop” so is out to arrest all bad
bidders from speeding is a bad experience. Usually this type of
partner is very disciplined herself so wants to show the world that bad bidding should be punished
. This type of partner has a “trump stack” mentality so you do not pull my
penalty doubles ever. This philosophy is all right for weak rubber & weak match point games but that is all . It
is a very bad way to play IMPS at
a high level . Doubling with a truck stack in
competition destroys the delicate balance of nature. Let partner double with
the hand that is short in their suit.
Negative doubles , without playing negative doubles at
that level.
In IMPS & high level auctions of
4♠ & below,
the default
double should show shortness in that suit . It is the singleton that
doubles so the other hand converts when there is a trump stack . All doubles of high level competitive auctions are D.S.I.P. doubles
so pulling doubles should be a very common occurrence. At the 5 level , we revert to trump stack penalty doubles.
Lets take a common auction , a pre-empt in the sandwich position .
|
|
pass |
|
|
|
1♦ |
|
1♥ |
|
|
? |
3♠ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You hold ♠KQJ10 ♥xx ♦AKxx ♣xxx . 3 spades is definitely going down but do you double with your minimum hand ?
No , this is a clear
cut pass . When partner cannot re-open with a double with her obvious shortness in spades , we take our
plus. Why , for a number of reasons . One , because the double is far more useful to
define a different meaning to it in
these situations. I like playing Thrump doubles in
the sandwich position also . The double asks partner
to bid 3NT with a spade stopper . The double shows I
have a good hand but no suitable bid. When I had a good hand with a spade stopper , I would just bid 3NT myself . The 2nd
reason for passing is that they may have a better spot if partner is too weak
to re-open. They will not rescue themselves
until they are doubled so why double. You probably do not even have a partial
your way !!
What if they pre-empt to the 4 level in the sandwich position
? Even if they are in game , the double cannot
be ambiguous . The double still means I wish to take offensive action but penalty is an option. Partner will
use his judgment so do something intelligent for the partnership.
In the re-opening position , doubles should always be takeout
(D.S.I.P.) rather than enforcer doubles
. Why , because partner is expected to do something
intelligent which includes bidding .
|
|
|
4♠ |
|
|
1♦ |
|
|
pass |
|
? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pass |
|
You have ♠KQJ10 ♥xx
♦AKxx ♣xxx . This is a clear cut pass . Partner will never
leave the double in unless trained to “never pull my doubles”. Say you have x AQxx AKxx AJxx
which is a clear cut double.
Partner with ♣KQxxxx
will bid clubs
so you might get to your +1370 instead of your +300 . If you have their suit , do not
be an enforcer , just take your plus
.
4NT is never
Blackwood when the opponents pre-empt 4♥/♠ and partner doubles . Use 4NT as Lebensohl over doubles so you have some new inferences.
Being an “enforcer” wrecks these
delicate Lebensohl auctions .
The last thing partner expects for your double is a stack of points in their suit . Penalty doubles are to be pulled or
converted not just blindly left in when you do not own the auction.
Here is a typical bad
“enforcer double” which thank goodness has become extinct playing D.S.I.P. competitive doubles. ♠AKxxx ♥QJxx ♦Axx ♣x , you overcall 1♠ nv to a vul 1♥ opener . Responder bids 3♥ & they bid 4♥ so your bid ? Playing D.S.I.P. theory
this is easy , you put the green card on the table
& collect your +100. What if you do not play D.S.I.P. theory ?
When you make an “enforcer double” , they can make
+630 in NT & +600 in 5♣. Astute opponents playing you for a trump
stack double will take advantage of this information. Lose 13 IMPS by trying to change +100
to +200. Also you have a partner who looking at the vulnerability might want to
pull the double for a disaster.
I really dislike
trump stack doubles. They work only in weak fields against weak players.
Against good players they add the option of changing the contract or trump end plays. In matchpoints fine ,
go for the top board but in IMPS it is still another example of just “taking your plus”. IMPS vrs Matchpoints
still again. Even good lead directing doubles
can backfire . I held ♠AQ109xx ♥K10x ♦K9x ♣A &
partner opened 1♦ . Val Tom overcalled 3♣
vul ,
partner & I subsequently bid 6♠ after KCB which showed we were
missing an Ace . Val doubled 6♠ so now what ? Val pre-empted vul so
probably has the ♣KQJ but not the missing Ace. She is certainly void in
diamonds which means that the odds are that partner holds long diamonds. You
have the diamond fillers so you might just have 6♠ , 5♦ & 1♣ in 6NT. You know 6♠ is going down with a
diamond ruff so you bid 6NT & all pass. Harry leads a small club & the
board hits with ♠KJx
♥QJ ♦AJ108x ♣Jxx so you win your ♣A and lead the ♦9 & let it ride. As expected Val discards a heart. You now run
all 6 of your spade tricks to reach a 5 card end position. Harry must guard ♦Qxxx & the now singleton ♥A. You cash the ♦K & finesse again ending up on the board to lead a heart &
Harry is forced to give you 6NT J
.