2008-01-07 06:24
Hand Evaluation – Doubles ( captaincy )
PITBULLS:
Once you
have described your distribution & limited hand to partner & she doubles
the opponents , captaincy rules apply when forcing
pass theory does not apply. She knows more about
your hand than you do of hers , so the double is trump stack penalty.
In our system , we have discarded “up the line
bidding” in favour of showing our distribution. We rebid 1NT
with a balanced hand so if we bid a suit , we are
showing distribution. We are describing our hand to partner ,
so partner knows what to reasonably expect. Therefore ,
trump stack penalty doubles apply in auctions due to captaincy considerations
where we do not
necessarily own the auction.
This is why pre-empts or pre-emptive bidding are an exception
to D.S.I.P. competitive theory. Partner is
always the captain opposite a pre-empt , so she has trump stack penalty double
rights.
A 1♥-P-2♥-2♠
4♥-4♠-P-P
X
should be penalty based on captaincy considerations.
Take this
auction for example. Everybody vul ,
1♣-1♦-1♥-P
1♠- 2/3♦-X
. Opener has described 9 or 10 black cards so what more is there to say ? There are no unbid suits left , so a double to clarify responders hand is meaningless
as partner has already described her hand. Responder is an unlimited captain
of this auction , so she has rights to make a penalty
double. There is no reason for a D.S.I.P. double as distribution around the
table is a known factor. Also , there is no hint
of competing as responder is unlimited. Whether responder is unlimited should
have an effect on D.S.I.P. double theory. There is a school of thought that a double
by an unlimited hand should be
co-operative penalty rather than an offensive
hand type.
In keeping
with the captaincy concept , a NT rebid is an
unambiguous auction. You do not need a D.S.I.P.
competitive double to clarify things , as the 1NT
rebid is quite
descriptive with a tight range.
1♣-1♦-1♥-P
1NT-2♦-X
By virtue of the 1NT rebid & responders unlimited status , we have transferred captaincy to
responder. Therefore , the double of 2♦ is for penalty.
Quite often
these “captaincy doubles” adhere to the over/under rule.
We are behind their suit when we make our trump stack penalty double. Anyway , the double is penalty as partner has given us
enough information for us to do our dastardly deed. As with pre-empts , partner has already described her hand , so
captaincy enters the picture. Trump stack doubles are not totally dead in these
auctions.
The most
common “captaincy” situation in Bridge is a simple raise of a major
with opener bidding or jumping to game.
When the opponents now interfere belatedly , opener is
captain as obviously she knows the situation better than you do. A double
in these situations can be of the forcing pass variety if the previous bids
deemed it to be such . However ,
when the auction was not competitive
or forcing passes not involved ,
captaincy should apply rather than D.S.I.P. doubles. You need a truly
competitive auction for D.S.I.P. doubles to apply.
Ilya Kuzkin advises to modify
“captaincy” in simple raise auctions in favour of
D.S.I.P. competitive doubles as long as the rank of their suit does not force
the auction to the 5 level. This means that without active competition
in these simple major raise auctions
, a double of 4♣,4♦
& 4♥ is
D.S.I.P. , however a double of 4♠ would be penalty as
that forces us to the 5 level. With active competing
up to the game level , even a double of 4♠ is
D.S.I.P. though nv vrs vul.
A fit & penalty doubles of the opponents is
not a good mix anyway.
D.S.I.P. competitive
doubles is a new concept & do not conform to the standard rules for penalty
doubles. Those of us who play competitive doubles still respect
captaincy considerations though. In the hearts vrs
spades battles , leaping to your game does not turn on
forcing passes except in one instance ( you vul &
they are not.) . What these leaps to game ( or just
bidding game ) in the major do though is assign captaincy
to the game bidder. D.S.I.P. & forcing passes do not apply.
Under game ,
D.S.I.P. competitive doubles apply as we are in a competitive battle.
Along with the same theme of no “up
the line bidding” , Tom Gandolfo has some ideas for 1♣-P-1♦ auctions where they bid
in the sandwich. Since we do not play up the line bidding ,
how do we show good balanced openers without a stopper in their suit after they
have bid in the sandwich position ? Tom suggests
playing a double to show balanced hands without a stopper in their suit . Since
we do not bid a major with a balanced hand , Tom says
use a double to show these hands. Tom suggests a pass would only be made when
holding their suit & waiting for a re-opening double to convert for
penalty. A 1NT rebid of course , shows a
balanced hand with a stopper in their suit.