Saturday, September 07, 2002 1:06 AM

Hand Evaluation – Defining Q bids

 

PITBULLS:

 

            3NT is an important goal in Bridge . We even define Q bids by whether they are below 3NT or not . Q bids at the 4 level & above are “pure” Q bids which show a control. Q bids below 3NT can be just stoppers , a suit  & “groping for 3NT”  . They can be asking Q bids or telling Q bids. This treatment is in accordance with “game before slam” philosophy or  hand evaluation concept.

 

ex  1♣                 2♣

     2                                      Q bid ?  Not necessarily . This could just be

 

 a 4 card heart suit for 3NT or heart game  purposes . If the bidding subsequently “takes off”, it was a Q bid but assume it was a natural suit or NT try initially ..

 

      Inverted minors need Q bidding understandings . Try this sequence

 

 1-P-2-P

  3-P-3

 

            3should be a natural NT grope ( telling) or a 4 card heart suit  so opener will bid 3NT with a club stopper but not spades stopped. Responder is expected to pull to 4 without spades stopped. A 3♠ bid by opener shows spades & denies a club stopper.  A 3grope by responder should show spades ,  denying one or both of the other suits for NT purposes. Responder will only bid 3NT with both stopped & 4 with only one or none. If opener had both black suits stopped , the 3 rebid initially was questionable.

 

If the opponents are in the auction , a Q bid of their suit is a grope for 3NT . This is called the Western Q bid . The Western Cuebid is used in a contested auction to ask partner to bid 3NT with a stopper in the opponents' suit, for the purpose of playing that contract. Without a stopper, partner can make a nonforcing, natural suit bid. Western cues are usually used when a partnership are both bidding different suits in a contested auction but cannot locate a playable suit game contract. There is usually an implied minor fit somewhere but it is not a requirement . The PITBULLS are already quite familiar with examples of Western cue-bids where the opponents have overcalled a suit.  However .when the opponents have bid 2 suits,  this is the understanding :

 

                 1 3♣

 1                         1   3 !

 2                 2♣

 

 

Showing a heart stopper & asking partner to bid 3NT with a club stopper. When looking for 3NT after the opponents have bid two suits, a cue-bid of either one shows, rather than asks for, a stopper in that suit.

 

  There are also delicate bidding auctions where partner is in effect making an asking  Q  bid with no opponents in the auction !. The inference is that partner would have bid 3NT herself with a stopper in that suit

 

Example

 

    1           1

    2♣           3

    3!                                      I have limited my hand with 3 invitational , partner

has limited his hand by a 2♣ rebid . If partner has heart values he would bid 3NT himself so 3 asks partner to bid 3NT with a heart stopper !!

 

      1♣              1

      2♣              2                  It is silly to show a spade stopper as the wrong side

      2                                     is playing the NT . This is steering the NT to partners

hand if there is a spade  stopper & showing a   

healthy 2♣ rebid .  This is a stronger auction than

bidding 3♣ again without a spade stopper .  A 3 club

bid would just say “ get out of my face “ .                       

 

      1               1NT

      2                3♣                 Diamond values heading towards 3NT . Bid 3NT

      3                                      if you have spades . A rubber player would not bid 

                                                 this way,  instead leaping to 3NT . Opening leader  would have to

 guess between spades & diamonds .                                                           

 

 

                                         

      1                1

      2♣                3♣        Both sides have limited their hands . 3 asks partner to bid 3NT with a ♠ stopper . 

      3               3NT       3 suits bids so 4th suit asks for a   stopper !!

 

           

Shows a good hand for previous bidding without a stopper in spades .

 

 

There is a generalization that differentiates between an asking & telling Q bid . This is based on the number of suits already bid . The following is from the net :

 

Telling and Asking Cuebids

 

Cuebids below 3NT are usually attempts to reach 3NT. When two suits have been bid, the cuebid of the third suit is a Telling Cuebid, looking for a stopper in the fourth suit. When three suits have been bid, the cuebid of the fourth suit is an Asking Cuebid, asking for a stopper in that suit.

 

Opener  Responder

1      2

3      3 telling cuebid  3 suits bid

 

1      2

3 ♣     3 asking cuebid 4th suit . Responder should bid 3NT with diamonds unless very strong.

 

 

In Q biding auctions when the opponents double one of your bids , the redouble is a Q bid showing 2ND or 1st  control of the suit . I think this should be true in auctions above 3NT but when we are groping or making a Western Q , the redouble can have a different meaning .  Maurice plays the redouble as a partial stopper Qx or Jxx  or 10xxx . May as well use it for something as a direct  NT bid shows the full stopper .