Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:05 PM
 

Hand Evaluation – Partnership ( Bidding Ambiguity )  

 

PITBULLS:

 

I am mentoring a few people on Monday nights . One bidding fault I have noticed is they do not try to prevent ambiguity in their bidding. The purpose of bidding as in any communication is to paint a clear picture of his hand so partner can come to a mutual decision within the partnership. Inviting partner to the party is a bidding skill that needs to be acquired. How will partner interpret your bid ?  Here is an example .QJx AJxx AJxK10x , RHO bids 1♠ . The mentee chose the more ambiguous double rather than the more descriptive 1NT overcall. This got redoubled so around to the doubler so he bid 2♣ on his 3 card suit as 1NT now over stated his values.  ! Now partner should have a clear picture of his 4-3-3-3 16 HCP J You have an obligation to partner to describe your hand,  so do not ignore her. Choose the unambiguous bid going in.

 

            Another bidding fault I see quite often is mentees over using the negative double which introduces ambiguity due to the nature of the beast.. The negative double was designed to handle hands where you do not have a natural bid available. ♠Q10x AQ10xx AJxxx , his partner opened 1♣ with a 1♠ overcall so the mentee doubled . His LHO leaped to 3♠ pre-emptive so around to him again.  He has now painted himself into a corner by his initial double. 4 is now a ridiculous single-handed bid so he doubled & all pass. This went for +200 but the slip indicated +650 for the field in hearts. If you bid 2 naturally results in your heart game,  no matter what type of interference they throw at you. The initial negative double made the auction ambiguous.

 

            A mentee had this hand ♠void x KQ109xx ♣KJ1098x , with everybody vul his LHO opened 1♠ & I overcalled 1NT. His RHO bid 4♠ so now what ? 4NT for the minors right ? This is an ambiguous bid though so partner might interpret it to play which is what happened. You need very little for a minor suit slam with a void in the opponent’s suit so bid 5NT . This can not be misinterpreted by anybody. Pick a minor at the 6 level. Alternatively a spade Q bid can show any two suiter with a 1st round control in that suit. You bid 5♠ , partner bids 6 so this makes. Do not pick the most ambiguous bid possible from a list of alternatives. 4NT is right up their on the ambiguity scale.

 

            You hold ♠K109x xxx x  KQxxx  , partner opens 1NT however the infamous Mr. Willard overcalls 2 alerted as DONT by Sue Schwan. The mentee doubled as in the Standard Dictator system  that just shows cards . Sue Schwan redoubled so around to you again. The redouble was punitive saying I have hearts with a good hand. What does partners pass mean ? Probably anything as you are captain of this ship. This auction is ambiguous though as partner may have a 5-5 club fit with you or a 4-4 spade fit with nothing wasted in hearts. Discretion is the better part of valour so you pull to 3♣ & all is well. The mentee passed but 2XX making 3 did not match point well. Do not put all your eggs in one basket when the auction is ambiguous so nobody really knows what is going on. You leave partner out of the picture so you are just guessing rather than bidding. Passing the XX as punitive needs a clear & unambiguous partnership understanding. Guessing is repugnant to experts so try to prevent choosing ambiguous bids. .