Sunday, September 18, 2005 7:27 PM

Hand Evaluation - 2   Interference

 

PITBULLS:

 

            You know you love interfering with an opponent’s forcing 1♣ auction. What if the tables are turned & they interfere with your strong 2♣ auction ? I dislike opening at the one level with huge hands where game is extremely likely. Strong two suiters are opened at the one level with many players. I loathe that practice , so we must come up with some “fixes” as 2♣ does pre-empt the auction. If we have a free ride , a clever use of relays allows the strong 2♣ to show her two suits at a relatively low level. One universal understanding is necessary though with interference. A double by the 2♣ opener shows the NT range of hands without much in their suit. An “inverted double” some experts have named the concept.

 

            Here is a Maurice & Susan auction where the double to show a NT hand reduces ambiguity when the opponents are trying to confuse the auction. Susan has a flat 23 HCP & opens 2♣. My partner overcalls 2( equal nv ) & Maurice bids 2to show 4 controls in their system . I bid 3 so Susan as a simple bid to describe her hand as doubles at any level show the NT hands. She could hold a long club suit & bid 3NT based on playability but the double unambiguously shows the NT range of hands. The double gets converted by Maurice & I run to my 6 card suit which gets doubled. If left in , I go 6 down for 1400 which turns out to be a 3 IMP loss for them as the field is in 7NT making. 3X takes no tricks for  -2300.

 

Here is an auction where Susan & Kiz  were handed a +1400 gift due to the opponents interfering with their 2♣ auction. Kiz has a strong 2NT rebid so she opens 2♣ . I overcall 2 so Susan passes showing zero or one control. My partner bids 2 so Kiz dutifully doubles to show the 2NT opener. Susan converts for penalty. Kiz holds the AQxx & partner has converted for penalty. Kiz could have held Qx for the double as she is only describing her NT bid. Her double was not penalty nor did it say that she held spades.  You lead the ♠A & continue when you see the board & they go down 6 !. Partner will never pass 2X without spades & nothing. That would mean the 2♣ opener would need 7 defensive tricks with the alleged  2NT rebid to beat the contract two ( doubling partial into game )  which is very fuzzy thinking.

 

What if the opponents interfere in the sandwich position by bidding directly or raising his partner ? You have a two suiter as your 2♣ opener ? Since our relay system is off in competition, we need another fix. Rodwell has come up with an idea that he uses with his precision 1♣ openers that are two suiters. The “double pass inversion” he calls it. As usual,  from Meckwell it is quite logical. A double by the 2 club bidder should always show the NT hands or 3 suiters . Let us repeat that , a double by opener always shows a NT hand ,  not penalty. A bid obviously shows the one suited hands so NT is left as natural based on playability. What does the pass mean ?

 

 What about the pass by the 2♣ opener ? This is the inversion which commands partner to double. Partner may only break this relay only with an exceptional hand. This action is used as a relay as now when the 2♣ bidder bids a suit , he shows a two suiter DONT style . Who would have thought of a pass as a relay to a double ? This “pass & pull” concept applies at all levels below 3♠ so above that normal forcing pass & pull understandings apply. Some call this concept “inverted doubles “ . In fact with this “pass & pull” understanding with the rank order of suits you can identify your two suiter exactly. Bidding immediately always shows a one suiter , of course.

 

            AKQxx AKQxxx x ♣ x          2♣-3-P-4  

P*-P-X-P 

4    

 

The pass is a relay to a double and now the 4 bid shows a two suiter. Partner has ♠xxxx x xx ♣AJ10xxx & bids 4 . 4NT brings one Ace and 6 is attained.

 

            AKQxx Ax x ♣ AKQJx            2♣-3-P-4 

 P*-P-X-P 

 4           Must be a black two suiter as we bypassed hearts.

 

            x  Ax AKJ10x ♣AKQxx            2♣-2-P-3

  P*-P-X-P  

  4♣          Must be the minors as spades were not mentioned.

 

            A double shows a NT hand or the other 3 suits. What if you ( 2♣ opener)  have a penalty double of their suit ? Simple , you pass so partner is forced to double & all pass . This may expose a psyche or very bad bidders.

 

            AKQJ x Kx ♣ AK109xx          2♣-P-2-3 

P*-P-X-P

 P-P

 

            Jump Q bids or splinters  should not exist in competitive auctions over 2♣ as the psychers are out in full force. Generally when you bid their suit as a jump , it is natural . Why double & allow them to describe their escape suit ? A pass works just fine as a penalty double. A double by responder followed by bidding their suit can be a Q bid with this understanding. If they interfere with artificial bids ( either /or) scenarios , Q bids by our side do not exist unless their fit is established. Partner held Axxxx Jxx KxxQx  & I opened 2♣ with the opponents interfering with their toy. Responder passed & RHO bid 2♠ so I bid 3♣ to describe by 2♣ opener. Responder now bid 3♠ so is it a western Q bid with a minor fit asking opener to bid 3NT ? No , it is natural as the opponents have not established that spades are their fit .

 

            We have been discussing what opener’s bids , doubles & passes mean. What about responder with interference from the opponents ? What is a direct double or by responder when they interfere ? I think showing controls when we do not have a suit established is silly. Not so with interference though. Since they are jamming you & RHO might also get in on the act, knowing how many controls responder has is very valuable information.

 

We play that a double or XX  is penalty . The pass shows zero or 1 controls so step responses shows  2 controls etc .  Tom Gandolfo added a twist. NT always shows 4 controls so you skip over that step if the rank of their suit warrants it.

 

Here is a hand from Victoria where Tom & I reached 6NT . Tom opened 2♣ with AKQ AKQJ AK9x ♣xx  , my RHO doubled . I held xxxx xxx Jxxx ♣AK so playing Tom’s system ,  a XX shows clubs , a pass shows zero or 1 controls , 2 shows 2 controls so I bid 2 showing 3 controls. Tom bids 6NT , so we have 12 tricks for +1440 .

 

            Counter defenses are needed when they enter your 2♣ auction. Forcing passes come with the territory of interference & 2♣ openers. Pass & pull at the slam level is the strongest auction available. The normal forcing pass “pecking order” of course applies.  Discuss with partner.