Monday, July 25, 2005 6:52 AM

Hand Evaluation - 1 Club  2 Response

 

PITBULLS:

 

            Bidding theorists realize that a 1♣-P-2-P is a rather lame bid as a WJS. The bid does not cut it as a pre-emptive action as it keeps nobody out of the auction. A 3 bid after partners opens 1♣ does the job much better if that is not defined as a splinter. Many partnerships have sought out different meanings for the 2 bid after a club opener. Weak major suit hands are sometimes shut out after partner opens 1♣ . The club opener has hearts but is too weak to reverse after a spade response so the heart fit is missed. Responder only has the values to bid once.  The club opener rebids two clubs but has good 3 card support for partner’s major but responder passes the club rebid. Quite often partner opens a club with a strong hand with the majors but partner is too weak to respond so a game in the major is missed. This causes partner to respond without the required HCP’s . However , psyching responses leads to more trouble more often than not.

 

            Opening 1♣ & rebidding 1NT with all balanced hands causes problems when responder is weak as you miss your 4-4 major suit fit. With 5 & 4♠ & a weak hand you are forced to pass 1NT or rebid your 5 card heart suit. You miss your 4-4 spade fit if partner suppressed that suit to rebid 1NT. Even with 5-5 in the majors , you can miss your 5-4 heart fit when partner rebids 2♣ since most play 2 as a one round force by responder. The 2 response showing the majors solves the problem & you describe your hand pretty well in one fell swoop. This is handy in competition.

 

           One clever solution is to use the 2  bid to show al 5-4 major hands ( both ways ) & 5-5 in the majors with values less than a response up to a weak response. The reasoning is that invitational & strong hands in the majors can take care of themselves. The HCP range for the 2 response is 4-8 , if 5-4 in the majors & even less if you are 5-5 (3 –6 ) . The opening quite often can place the contract after the 2 response. This adds a little “forcing club” element to your system as you do not need the required HCP’s for a response (2)  if you have the majors i.e. any chance for a major game.

 

      Use 2NT after the  2response as the only forcing bid & a game try . There are 4 steps you can use above 2NT at the 3 level  :  3♣ , 3 , 3 & 3♠.  So lets define some use for these bids to suit our purpose. 3♣ is used as a catch all bid showing all maximums. 3, 3 & 3 shows the minimums with their respective patterns. For a memory aid , diamonds transfers to hearts showing 5 & 4. 3 transfers to spades showing 5 & 4 hearts. Spades are what left at the 3 level to show the 5-5 in the majors.

 

       With maximums , 3 asks by opener so you give Smolen responses ( bid 4 card suit) to show your distribution.

 

            Here is a summary of this  treatment that helps solve this problem after a 1♣ opening bid.

 

1♣       2        weak hand < 9 HCP with at least 5-4 in the majors;

 

                        IF 5 AND 4 , THEN 4 TO 8

                        IF 4 AND 5 , THEN 4 TO 8

                        IF 5 AND 5 , THEN 3 TO 6

 

1♣       2

2/♠                to play

2NT                 F1 round

3♣                   to play

3/3♠              invitational

3NT                 to play

 

1♣       2

2NT     3♣       maximum hand

            3        minimum, 4 AND 5

            3       minimum, 5 AND 4        steps based on spades

            3       minimum, 5 AND 5

 

1♣       2

2NT     3♣       maximum so going to game 3asks by opener

3        3/3 4 card suit, 5 in other major (Smolen)

            3NT     5-5

 

 

            If you are not “hung up” on maximums & minimums , you can play a simplified version after the 2NT query which leaves out minimum & maximums. Again as a memory aid , we use transfers to identify the 5 card major & need only 3 bids at the 3 level  to cover our bases..

 

 

1♣         2

2NT       3♣     5-5 majors

              3     4♠ AND 5

              3     5♠ AND 4

 

            I have used this toy for a while now & it is quite handy. I “borrowed” the idea from the Jacobs/Maksymetz system.